Mathematics as a form of expression is highly abstract, but nevertheless a language. The following example makes it easily clear that mathematics is a pure language. A mathematical expression is transformed, that is, merely converted into another, equivalent expression. Instead of the digit a at the k-th decimal place at
one writes the fraction
Then, from a semantic point of view, a "series of numbers" has become a "stack of fractions". To express a circumstance by means of language in alternative words corresponds exactly to the technical transformation into other equivalent mathematical expressions. Whether the symbols are words and letters, or formula symbols and fractions, is irrelevant. The famous sentence: "The natural numbers N={1,2,3,...} are given by God and everything else is human work" is misleading, because the natural numbers are already a human thinking structure. More accurate would be the sentence in the form: "The natural numbers, and everything that follows and builds on them, is man's work." Remarkable are two well-known fundamental formulas of the so human, mathematical object world:
and
If one combines now both terms, one obtains:
One recognizes a direct connection between the wave character of nature and an equivalent, energetic space-time. It is remarkable that for centuries an ominous world formula is searched, although it was already found.
The space-time "including all masses and their changes" and all quantum states, waves and fields of the universe is noumenon.
More insight is not necessary. To unite the standard model of the elementary particles with the theory of relativity is as senseless as if one wanted to unite good and evil or up and down to a single object:
If anyone unites the quantum theory with relativistic physics, there is just nothing. At this point, the world is divided into light and darkness. Essential for perception, but all this is only a fiction of the human mind. However, a knot in the brain of the people does not let them understand this simple connection. The essence of the macroscopic and microscopic reality is a unity which falls apart only in the illusion of the human brain. One and the same object is split up and expressed in different ways. One of the consequences of this can be found here on this page under "Micro and Macro".
Some bubbles of consciousness like to argue in the way, one cannot simply equate these two formulas above, because it concerns here, after all, two completely different, physical subareas, which one cannot link, nevertheless, so trivially and laymanlike. Unfortunately, they have not understood that zero is zero. They have never deeply realized the consequence of the fact that every mathematical equation is zero. They permanently calculate around in their own illusions, in the infinite manifestations of the noumenon.
All of this is certainly wonderfully suitable for achieving technical progress or, under certain circumstances, also gives great pleasure, but a so-called "theory of everything" can certainly never be found in this way, or an answer given to the biggest question.